Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 867/2021

Case between K V Reji vs Vivek O R regarding lifting of attachment

Court
MUNSIFF COURT, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-11-06
Duration
3 years 11 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Vivek O R, filed a petition to lift an attachment on a property as he needed to settle personal liabilities. The plaintiff, K V Reji, opposed the petition, arguing that the attachment is necessary to secure a money claim of Rs. 6,20,000.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition of the defendant, Vivek O R, to lift the attachment on the property since the fixed deposit offered as security was found insufficient to cover the total amount due.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition of the defendant, Vivek O R, to lift the attachment on the property since the fixed deposit offered as security was found insufficient to cover the total amount due.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the fixed deposit produced by the defendant was not adequate to cover the entire claim amount with interest and costs.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the fixed deposit produced by the defendant was not adequate to cover the entire claim amount with interest and costs.
Supporting Evidence
The court is satisfied that the security furnished is not sufficient enough to satisfy the suit claim and hence petition is liable to be dismissed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, 1. The above petition is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K V Reji
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vivek O R
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Fixed Deposit Receipt for Rs.6,20,000/- from South Indian Bank, Chottanikkara Branch

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aynosh Micheal P S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anto Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The petition filed by the defendant for lifting the existing attachment over the property was dismissed.
Evidence:
Therefore the court is satisfied that the security furnished is not sufficient enough to satisfy the suit claim and hence petition is liable to be dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K V Reji vs Vivek O R regarding lifting of attachment
Case Code Year
Case between K V Reji vs Vivek O R regarding lifting of attachment

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 11/02/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won