Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 664 /2025

Case between K Sivasankar et al vs Shyamily K S regarding temporary injunction

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-07-03
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner K Sivasankar, represented by his power of attorney holder Muhammad Asif K M, seeks a temporary injunction against the respondent Shyamily K S to prevent trespassing into his flat. The court granted the interim injunction based on the existence of a prima facie case.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a temporary injunction to the petitioner, restraining the respondent from trespassing into the plaint schedule flat.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interim injunction granted restraining respondent from trespassing
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner made out a prima facie case and potential irreparable injury was identified if the injunction was not granted.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order of interim injunction is passed restraining respondent and her men from trespassing into the plaint schedule flat and causing obstruction to the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the same until further orders.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

K Sivasankar (54 years years) No. T1, Chandra Flats, Brindavan Street, West Mambalam, Chennai 600033 Muhammad Asif K M (46 years years) Kaithakkaparambil, residing near SNDP Samajam, Westside of Puthan Pally, Azhikode Jetty P O, Azhikode Village, Kodungallur Taluk, Trichur District, Pin- 680666

Defendants

Shyamily K S (33 years years) Kokkappally Maliyil House, Peroor P O, Pin- 686337, Peroor Village, Ettumanoor, Kottayam

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interim injunction restraining respondent and her men from trespassing into the plaint schedule flat and causing obstruction to the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the same until further orders.
Evidence:
an order of interim injunction is passed restraining respondent and her men from trespassing into the plaint schedule flat and causing obstruction to the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the same until further orders.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases