Case Summary
The petitioner seeks to remit the Advocate commissioner's report and plan related to measuring properties. The respondents opposed the petition citing lack of merits and timeliness.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Case Type
Petition under Section 151 of The Code of Civil Procedure
Final Judgment
No
The petition to remit the commission report was dismissed due to belated filing and lack of merits.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- K Rajkumar
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o late Santhamma
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K Rajalakshmi
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- W/o T Sathyanathan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- T Sathyanathan
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- S/o late K P Raman Nair
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K Sethu Raj
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- S/o T Sathyanathan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The petition filed by the plaintiff sought to remit back the commission report prepared without identifying the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Petition under Section 151 of The Code of Civil Procedure
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K Rajkumar vs K Rajalakshmi et al regarding remittance of commission report and plan
Case Code Year
Case between K Rajkumar vs K Rajalakshmi et al regarding remittance of commission report and plan