Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 464/2024

Case between K Prasad vs Thaharudheen regarding temporary injunction

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-06-24
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

K Prasad filed a petition against Thaharudheen seeking a temporary injunction to prevent alleged encroachment and unauthorized construction on his property. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case in support of his claim.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition filed by K Prasad, determining that he had not demonstrated a prima facie case. The balance of convenience did not favor the petitioner.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition filed by K Prasad, determining that he had not demonstrated a prima facie case. The balance of convenience did not favor the petitioner.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case and the balance of convenience was not in his favor.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case and the balance of convenience was not in his favor.
Supporting Evidence
The court is satisfied that the petitioner has not proved the existence of a prima facie case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the above petition is dismissed. The parties shall bear their respective costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K Prasad
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thaharudheen
Party Age
59
Plaintiffs Documents
True copy of Sale deed no. 930/2000 of Edappally SRO, True copy of Property tax paid receipt, True copy of Judgment in OS No. 554/2009 of Munsiff Court, Ernakulam, True copy of Survey Sketch prepared in OS 554/2009, True copy of complaint filed before the municipality with receipt, True copy of Complaint filed before the Police Station with receipt
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V A Johnson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Eldho Cherian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Harikrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Cyriac Tom
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Naveen A Varkey
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K P Aravindakshan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Requested a temporary injunction against the defendant to prevent further encroachment.
Evidence:
The court is satisfied that the petitioner has failed to prove a prima facie case.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document establishing the plaintiff's ownership of the A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Property Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of payment for property tax, supporting the plaintiff's claim.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Previous court decision relevant to the claims made.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Survey Sketch
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Visual representation of the property relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document indicating complaints made to the municipality regarding the encroachment.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document indicating complaints made to the police regarding the encroachment.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report created to assess the properties in question.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Sketch related to the commission report.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K Prasad vs Thaharudheen regarding temporary injunction
Case Code Year
Case between K Prasad vs Thaharudheen regarding temporary injunction

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won