Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 464/2024

Case between K Prasad vs Thaharudheen regarding temporary injunction

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-06-24
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

K Prasad filed a petition against Thaharudheen seeking a temporary injunction to prevent alleged encroachment and unauthorized construction on his property. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case in support of his claim.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition filed by K Prasad, determining that he had not demonstrated a prima facie case. The balance of convenience did not favor the petitioner.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case and the balance of convenience was not in his favor.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the above petition is dismissed. The parties shall bear their respective costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

K Prasad (62 years years) Akshaya House No. 32/73A, GF Road, K D Plot Post, Kalamassery, Pin- 683109

Defendants

Thaharudheen (59 years years) Akhil Cottage (Thriveni residence No. 7), K D Plot P O, South Kalamassery-683104

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Requested a temporary injunction against the defendant to prevent further encroachment.
Evidence:
The court is satisfied that the petitioner has failed to prove a prima facie case.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document establishing the plaintiff's ownership of the A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Property Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of payment for property tax, supporting the plaintiff's claim.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Previous court decision relevant to the claims made.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Survey Sketch
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Visual representation of the property relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document indicating complaints made to the municipality regarding the encroachment.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document indicating complaints made to the police regarding the encroachment.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report created to assess the properties in question.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Sketch related to the commission report.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases