Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 756 /2024

Case between K M George vs Paul Chacko regarding settlement of dispute

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-03-03
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

K M George filed a suit against Paul Chacko. The case was settled through mediation, and the parties do not intend to proceed further.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as the parties have settled their dispute through mediation.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to refund of court fees.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as the parties have settled their dispute through mediation.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Through mediation, the parties resolved their dispute amicably.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Through mediation, the parties resolved their dispute amicably.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of mediation agreement is found to be lawful. Parties have stated that all dispute between the parties are settled in mediation.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed as per terms of mediation.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K M George
Party Age
77
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Paul Chacko
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Mediation report
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. Aneesh K R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. Sabir N S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is dismissed as per terms of mediation.
Evidence:
Parties have stated that all dispute between the parties are settled in mediation and parties do not intend to proceed with the suit further.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to refund of court fees.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to refund of court fees.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K M George vs Paul Chacko regarding settlement of dispute
Case Code Year
Case between K M George vs Paul Chacko regarding settlement of dispute

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won