Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 772/2023

Case between K K Valsala et al vs Surendran T K et al regarding suit dismissal for default

Court
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-03-15
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, K K Valsala and Dini Vijayan, filed a suit against the defendants, Surendran T K and Jayan T K. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs were absent and unrepresented in court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The case was dismissed as the plaintiffs failed to appear in court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed as the plaintiffs failed to appear in court.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed for default. All interim orders shall stand vacated.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K K Valsala
Party Age
71
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dini Vijayan
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Surendran T K
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayan T K
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Peter K Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Philip T Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Thomas T Varghese
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Achu Shuba Abraham
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Gayathri Vijayan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Kalyani G Menon
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Thahseem A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vishnu Satheesan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Urmila M G
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K K Valsala et al vs Surendran T K et al regarding suit dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between K K Valsala et al vs Surendran T K et al regarding suit dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won