Case Summary
Complainant filed a case against the accused under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act seeking punishment for dishonour of a cheque, later withdrew the complaint leading to the acquittal of the accused.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Acquittal under section 257 Cr.P.C.
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Final Judgment
No
The accused was acquitted under section 257 of the Cr.P.C. due to the complainant withdrawing the complaint in open court.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
The accused is acquitted u/s.257 Cr.P.C.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- K. Hariprakash
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hasnnul Benna
Plaintiffs Documents
C.M.P 90/2018
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M.A. Biju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Law Firm
- Thrissur
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Dineesh Pookkayil
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Law Firm
- Tirur
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Acquittal
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Accused acquitted under section 257 Cr.P.C.
Evidence:
The accused is acquitted u/s.257 Cr.P.C.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between K. Hariprakash vs Hasnnul Benna regarding dishonour of cheque
Case Code Year
Case between K. Hariprakash vs Hasnnul Benna regarding dishonour of cheque
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case