Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 259/2023

Case between K. Geetha et al vs FEDERAL BANK LTD regarding declaration of presumption of death

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- RCC
Judge
Smt.Salini.B
Order Date
2025-10-30
Duration
approximately-14 years 1 month 9 days
Case Closed
Thu, 10/30/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, K. Geetha and Appu N. Ramakrishnan, are seeking a declaration that Sri C.R. Narayanan, who went missing, is presumed dead, and that they are his legal heirs entitled to receive his terminal benefits from the defendant, Federal Bank Ltd.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court declared that Sri C.R. Narayanan is presumed to be dead and that the plaintiffs are his legal heirs entitled to receive all eligible benefits from the defendant bank.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Declaration that Sri.C R Narayanan is presumed to be dead and direction to disburse all terminal benefits to the plaintiffs
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court declared that Sri C.R. Narayanan is presumed to be dead and that the plaintiffs are his legal heirs entitled to receive all eligible benefits from the defendant bank.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs proved their status as legal heirs and the need for a declaration of death for accessing terminal benefits.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs proved their status as legal heirs and the need for a declaration of death for accessing terminal benefits.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiffs have right, title and interest at present over all assets, funds, rights, properties and benefits to which late Sri.Narayanan was entitled.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as per the following terms: 1. It is to be declared that Sri.C R Narayanan (Formerly residing at T.C.4/508, D1, Sreevilas Lane, Kowdiar, Thiruvananthapuram is presumed to be dead and that the plaintiffs are his legal heirs and that they are entitled to receive all eligible benefits and emoluments from the defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K. Geetha
Party Age
59
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Appu. N. Ramakrishnan
Party Age
25
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
FEDERAL BANK LTD
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Invitation Card, Copy of Marriage Certificate from Lalith Mahal Fort, Thiruvananthapuram, Birth Certificate of the 2nd plaintiff, Copy of School Certificate of the 2nd plaintiff, Copy of FIR No.1010/2011 of Peroorkada Police Station, Copy of Declaration dated 01.06.2022 issued by Sub Divisional Magistrate, Thiruvananthapuram, Letter to General Manager, H R Management Dept, Federal Bank dated 11.05.2022, Letter issued by Federal Bank to plaintiff dated 12.08.2022, Letter from Tahasildar, Thiruvananthapuram to the plaintiff dated 29.11.2022.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V. Suresh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Sandeep. T. George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
It is to be declared that Sri.C R Narayanan is presumed to be dead and the plaintiffs are his legal heirs.
Evidence:
It is to be declared that Sri.C R Narayanan (Formerly residing at T.C.4/508, D1, Sreevilas Lane, Kowdiar, Thiruvananthapuram is presumed to be dead and that the plaintiffs are his legal heirs.
Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to disburse all terminal benefits to the plaintiffs.
Evidence:
The defendant is further directed by a decree of mandatory injunction to disburse of all terminal benefits to which Sri Narayanan.C.R. would have been legally eligible to the plaintiffs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Invitation Cards
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original Invitation cards and covers.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Marriage Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Marriage Certificate from Lalith Mahal Fort, Thiruvananthapuram.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Birth Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Birth Certificate of the 2nd plaintiff dated 28.12.2021.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: School Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of School Certificate of the 2nd plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Photographs
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photographs (6 in Numbers) marked subject to proof.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: FIR
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of FIR No.1010/2011 of Peroorkada Police Station.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Declaration Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Declaration issued by Sub Divisional Magistrate, Thiruvananthapuram.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Declaration
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Declaration from RDO.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Letter to General Manager, H R Management Dept, Federal Bank.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Letter from Bank
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Letter issued by Federal Bank to plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Letter from Tahasildar
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Letter from Tahasildar, Thiruvananthapuram to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A11

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Legal heirship declaration
Case Code
Case between K. Geetha et al vs FEDERAL BANK LTD regarding declaration of presumption of death
Case Code Year
Case between K. Geetha et al vs FEDERAL BANK LTD regarding declaration of presumption of death

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Wed, 09/21/2011 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 10/30/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won