O.S No. 938/2018

Case between K. Abdul Shukur Naha vs Mohammed Sali V.A et al regarding court fee payment

Court

THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM

Judge

Sri. Rohit Nandakumar

Order Date

2024-06-26

Duration

approximately-5 years 0 days

Case Closed

Wed, 06/26/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

K. Abdul Shukur Naha filed a suit against Mohammed Sali V.A and another party regarding the payment of court fees. The court rejected the claim due to non-payment of the balance court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court ruled against the plaintiff due to non-payment of the required court fee.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to pay the balance court fee as ordered.

Why Defendant Won:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

The plaintiff represented. Balance Court Fee not paid as ordered. Plaintiff rejected.

Judgment Evidence:

Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 26th day of June, 2024.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Sri. K. Abdul Shukur Naha
Party Age: 71
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Mohammed Sali V.A

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sri. Sameer

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Harish R Menon
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sandhya K.N
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Prasanth A.G
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sam Isaac Pothiyil
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Anila Umesh
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: N.S Hasna Mol
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Tinu Johnson
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification