Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.85/2010

Case between Jyothish Kumar (Minor) et al vs S.Anilkumar et al regarding amendment to suit

Court
Court of Additional Munsiff-I
Judge
Smt.Karthika A.R
Order Date
2025-03-20
Duration
Case Code No.
85
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Jyothish Kumar, a minor, represented by his father regarding a dispute over property and the necessity of amending the suit. The defendants have denied the plaintiff's title over the property and allegations of encroachment have been raised.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for amendment to the suit as it was deemed necessary for fair disposal and determination of issues regarding property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for amendment to the suit as it was deemed necessary for fair disposal and determination of issues regarding property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The amendment was necessary for the fair disposal of the case as it addressed the real matter in controversy.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The amendment was necessary for the fair disposal of the case as it addressed the real matter in controversy.
Supporting Evidence
The amendment sought for is to be allowed as it seems to be necessary. Moreover no prejudice will be caused to the defendant as the evidence has not yet commenced.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result the petition is allowed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jyothish Kumar
Relation
represented by his father S.Anil Kumar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
S.Anilkumar
Party Age
41
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muraleedharan Nair
Party Age
58
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Deepak Twinkle Sanal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
The amendment sought for is to incorporate inconsistent pleas to the plaint and is attempting to change the nature of the suit.
Evidence:
the plaintiff has strongly argued that the amendment is necessary for the fair disposal of the case and for the real determination of issues.
Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff had sought to add the reliefs of the declaration of title and recovery of possession by way of amendment.
Evidence:
the amendment sought for is to be allowed as it seems to be necessary.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff had sought to add the reliefs of the declaration of title and recovery of possession by way of amendment.
Evidence:
the amendment sought for is to be allowed as it seems to be necessary.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2010

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won