Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 966/2022

Case between Justice Muhammed Shafi K.A. vs Ratheesh K. regarding settlement in mediation

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-01-27
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Justice Muhammed Shafi K.A. initiated a suit against Ratheesh K. The matter was settled in mediation, and the court accepted the mediation report.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the terms of the mediation report, which was signed by both parties. The suit was decreed in accordance with the report.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fee
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the terms of the mediation report, which was signed by both parties. The suit was decreed in accordance with the report.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Mediation report was accepted as lawful and not opposed to public policy.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Mediation report was accepted as lawful and not opposed to public policy.
Supporting Evidence
Perused the terms of mediation report and found as lawful and not opposed to the public policy and also that it was signed by both the parties.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence mediation report is accepted. Suit is decreed in terms of mediation report.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Justice Muhammed Shafi K.A.
Party Age
81
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ratheesh K.
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A. Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rajagopalan A.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.N. Manmadan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R. Rajesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.T. Jose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of mediation report.
Evidence:
Suit is decreed in terms of mediation report.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to refund of court fee, as per law.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to refund of court fee, as per law.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Justice Muhammed Shafi K.A. vs Ratheesh K. regarding settlement in mediation
Case Code Year
Case between Justice Muhammed Shafi K.A. vs Ratheesh K. regarding settlement in mediation

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
ERNAKULAM
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won