O.S. No. 992/2016

Case between Judit @ Judy Sylvester vs Rajan, Neethu, Cheranallore Panchayath regarding dismissal of suit

Court

COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM

Judge

Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany

Order Date

2025-11-25

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Judit @ Judy Sylvester filed a suit against Rajan, Neethu, and Cheranallore Panchayath. The court dismissed the case due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not present any representation and indicated no intention to proceed.

Why Defendant Won:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

Satisfied that plaintiff does not intend to proceed with case.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed. All interim orders shall stand vacated.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Judit @ Judy Sylvester
Party Age: 48
Relation: D/o late Sylvester and W/o Jeslin

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Rajan
Party Age: 44
Relation: S/o Raman

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Neethu
Party Age: 37
Relation: W/o Rajan

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Cheranallore Panchayath
Relation: represented by its Secretary

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: George Thomas Ollukkaran
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: R Divakaran
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: T K Ajithkumar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Plaintiff does not intend to proceed with case.

Evidence:

Satisfied that plaintiff does not intend to proceed with case. Hence suit is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification