Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 936/2019

Case between Jude Thadevus et al vs Babu George et al regarding easement of necessity

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-06-27
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a petition to implead additional defendants regarding the right to use a pathway as an easement of necessity. The petitioners claim they are necessary parties due to their ownership of the property affecting the outcome of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition to implead additional defendants has been allowed. The court found that their presence is necessary for proper adjudication.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, Petition is allowed. Office is directed to implead the petitioners as additional 3rd to 10th defendants in the suit.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Jude Thadevus (58 years years) Thachuthara House, Vaduthala, Kochi- 23 T T Stanly (61 years years) Thachuthara House, Near Vaduthala Market, Vaduthala P O, Cheranelloor Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District Reena Stanly (59 years years) Thachuthara House, Vaduthala Desom, Cheranelloor Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District, Kochi- 23

Defendants

Babu George (67 years) Door No. 52/465 (Old No. C C 29/23), Kurisinkal House, Toc-H School Road, Vyttila, Vyttila P O, Kochi- 682019 Joseph Kurian (65 years years) Pooppally House, Opposite YWCA, Chittoor Road, Karithala Desom, Ernakulam College P O, Ernakulam District, Pin- 682035 Mohan George (65 years years) Door No. 52/65 (old C C 29/19-A) Kurisinkal House, Toc-H School Road, Vyttila, Vyttila P O, Pin- 682019

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Implead the petitioners as additional defendants in the suit.
Evidence:
Accordingly I find that petitioner is a necessary party in the above suit to adjudicate the questions involved in the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Used to establish the petitioners' claim of ownership over the B and C schedule properties.
Reference:
Sale Deed Nos. 1420/2024 and 1421/2024
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court considered the testimonies and arguments presented during the hearing.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases