Case Summary
Joy and Joji Joy are the petitioners, while Hildamany and others are the respondents. The case involves a petition that was allowed by the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed by the court.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
ORDER Petition allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Joy
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Joji Joy
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hildamany
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Lailamony
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Prasannan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Titus
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sukruthamani
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Prasanth .R.S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sidhi.R.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Petition allowed.
Evidence:
Petition allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Joy vs Hildamany et al regarding petition
Case Code Year
Case between Joy vs Hildamany et al regarding petition