Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 898/2021

Case between Joy P T vs Sudheesh Kumar regarding suit rejection due to non-remittance of court fee

Court
II Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-11-12
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves plaintiff Joy P T and defendant Sudheesh Kumar regarding a civil suit. The suit was rejected by the court due to the plaintiff's failure to remit the required court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's failure to remit the court fee, despite being given several chances.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The suit was rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure due to non-payment of court fees.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Joy P T (31 years years) Parathara House, Manjummel P O, Eloor, Ernakulam District, Pin-683501

Defendants

Sudheesh Kumar (51 years years) Mamootiparambil House, Changampuzha Nagar P O, Kalamassery, Thrikkakara North Village, Pin- 682033

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was rejected due to non-remittance of balance court fee.
Evidence:
No Balance Court Fee seen remitted so far despite giving several chances. Hence suit is rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases