O.S No. 267/2011

Case between Joseph Peter P vs E.R.George et al regarding suit dismissal for default

Court

THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM

Judge

Sri. Padmakumar.G.

Order Date

2024-03-23

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Joseph Peter P filed a suit against E.R.George and others. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of proof affidavit.

Key Reasoning:

Why Defendant Won:

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Joseph Peter P
Party Age: 49
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: E.R.George
Party Age: 48
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Pauly
Party Age: 53
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Bonny
Party Age: 28
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Bristo
Party Age: 26
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Mandalath Francis
Party Age: 73
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: N.C.Joseph
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: P.K.Ravisankar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: V.Gopakumar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Peeyus A Kottam
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: M.K.Dileepan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: K.D.Vincent
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: S.Renjith
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: S.Unnikrishnan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Rejected

Description:

Suit dismissed for default.

Evidence: