Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 135/2023

Case between Joseph Martin vs Sreejith N U regarding eviction of tenant

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-09-10
Duration
approximately-4 years 4 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Joseph Martin, the petitioner, is the owner of a building that was leased to Sreejith N U for running a fitness center. The case revolves around the non-payment of rent and a petition for eviction after the lease expired.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for eviction, directing the tenant to vacate the premises and hand over possession to the landlord within 30 days.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of tenant from the petition schedule building
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's claim of outstanding rent and the respondent's failure to contest were adequately established.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) of the Act with costs as follows: The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building under Section 11(2)(b) of the Act within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Joseph Martin (56 years) Nilavareth House, Kaloor Post, Ernakulam District, Pin 682 018

Defendants

Sreejith N U (31 years) Neriyamlott House, Mamangalam, Palarivattom Post, Pin 682025, Edappally South Village, Kannayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District Nineesh Thankachan (33 years) Aluvassery House, Bhavans South Road, Elamakkara Post, Pin 682 026, Edappally North Village, Kannayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the landlord in possession of the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) of the Act.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Email
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Email dated 19.03.2020 issued by the respondent to the petitioner, acknowledged communication regarding rent.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Email
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Email dated 05.01.2021 issued by the respondent to the petitioner, acknowledged communication regarding rent.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Email
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Email dated 07.02.2021 issued by the petitioner to the respondent, part of correspondence.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer's notice dated 11.03.2021 to the respondent demanding payment.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal Cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original postal cover returned as unclaimed by the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal Cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original postal cover returned as unclaimed by Power of Attorney holder of the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Email
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Email dated 13.03.2021 showing attachment of legal notice to the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Email
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Email dated 25.03.2021 issued by the respondent to the petitioners, acknowledged communication regarding rent.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Email
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Email dated 09.10.2021 issued by the counsel for the petitioner to the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer's notice dated 09.10.2021 issued to the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A11

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 05/01/2020 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases