Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.320/2025

Case between Joseph et al vs Noble George et al regarding temporary injunction

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-03-26
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Joseph and Jessy are petitioners seeking a temporary injunction against Noble George and Aunpama Noble regarding construction without permission. The court has granted an interim injunction to prevent any construction that could endanger the plaintiffs' property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court issued an interim injunction preventing the defendants from constructing the building without necessary permissions. This decision was made to avoid potential irreparable harm to the plaintiffs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interim injunction restraining respondents from raising the building without permission
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court issued an interim injunction preventing the defendants from constructing the building without necessary permissions. This decision was made to avoid potential irreparable harm to the plaintiffs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner established a prima facie case demonstrating the likelihood of irreparable injury if the injunction was not granted.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner established a prima facie case demonstrating the likelihood of irreparable injury if the injunction was not granted.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioner has made out a prima facie case and if order of temporary injunction is not granted, irreparable injury is likely to be caused to the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order of interim injunction is passed restraining respondents and their men from raising the building in the B schedule without any permission from the concerned authorities.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Joseph
Party Age
71
Relation
S/o late Ouseph
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jessy
Party Age
70
Relation
W/o Joseph
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Noble George
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o George
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aunpama Noble
Party Age
36
Relation
W/o Noble George
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V M Sajan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ashitha Pauly
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Athul G T
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Tom Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sajana P S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Fahma Rafi
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interim injunction restraining respondents and their men from raising the building in the B schedule without any permission from the concerned authorities.
Evidence:
Hence an order of interim injunction is passed restraining respondents and their men from raising the building in the B schedule without any permission from the concerned authorities or doing anything in the building endangering the life of the plaintiff and detrimental to the A schedule property until further Orders.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Joseph et al vs Noble George et al regarding temporary injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Joseph et al vs Noble George et al regarding temporary injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won