Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1156/2023

Case between Jose Ukkru vs Sainudheen K J regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-07-14
Duration
approximately-2 years 2 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Jose Ukkru, seeks to recover an advance paid for a BMW car from the defendant, Sainudheen K J, who sold the car to another party without fulfilling his promise to assist with financing. The court found in favor of the plaintiff after examining the evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the defendant must pay the plaintiff Rs.3,10,001/- along with interest for failing to fulfill his agreement regarding the car sale.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant shall pay Rs.3,10,001/- along with interest at 10% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the defendant must pay the plaintiff Rs.3,10,001/- along with interest for failing to fulfill his agreement regarding the car sale.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established a case for recovery based on the advance paid and the defendant's failure to deliver the agreed upon sale.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
On perusal of the plaint, proof affidavit and documents produced, I am of the view that plaintiff has established a case and plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.3,10,001/- with interest from defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1) Defendant shall pay Rs.3,10,001/- along with interest @10% from the date of suit till the date of decree...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jose Ukkru
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sainudheen K J
Party Age
31
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certificate issued by Joint Regional Transport Officer, Kodungalloor; Certified copy of the statement of account issued by Canara Bank, Hill Palace branch; Certified copy of the statement of account issued by Canara Bank, Broadway branch; Registered lawyer notice dated 24.07.2023; Copy of the reply to lawyer notice dated 07.08.2023; Copy of complaint dated 21.08.2023 submitted to SHO, Central police station, Ernakulam; Acknowledgment receipt of the petition dated 24.08.2023 issued by Central police station, Ernakulam.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K G Cleetus
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Paul M V
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant shall pay Rs.3,10,001/- along with interest.
Evidence:
Defendant is directed to pay interest at the rate of 10% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant and her assets shall be liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Evidence:
Defendant and her assets shall be liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certificate showing the ownership of the car by the defendant issued by the Joint Regional Transport Officer, Kodungalloor.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the statement of account issued by Canara Bank, Hill Palace branch, Thripunithura.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the statement of account issued by Canara Bank, Broadway branch, Ernakulam.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Registered lawyer notice dated 24.07.2023.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Reply to lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the reply to lawyer notice dated 07.08.2023.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Police Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of complaint dated 21.08.2023 submitted to SHO, Central Police Station, Ernakulam.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Receipt of Petition
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt of the petition from Central Police Station dated 24.08.2023.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Acknowledgment Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment receipt of the petition dated 24.08.2023 issued by Central Police Station, Ernakulam.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Acknowledgment Cards
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment cards signed by the defendant's counsel.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Photographs
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photographs of vehicles.
Reference:
Ext.A10

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jose Ukkru vs Sainudheen K J regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Jose Ukkru vs Sainudheen K J regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 04/19/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won