Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 104/2023

Case between Jose Thomas vs Priya Varma regarding Rent Control Petition

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-08-09
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jose Thomas, the petitioner, is seeking possession of a commercial building from Priya Varma, the respondent. The court dismissed the rent control petition as not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the rent control petition as the respondent surrendered the vacant possession of the property.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Jose Thomas (73 years) House No. 30/1045, Murali lane, Kaniampuzha Road, Vytilla P.O., Ernakulam­682019

Defendants

Priya Varma (39 years) “Nanadanam”, Kannamkulangara, Tripunithura P.O., Nadama Village, Ernakulam District­682301

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The rent control petition was dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Counsel for the petitioner also endorsed as not pressed in the rent control petition. Hence, rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases