Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 104/2023

Case between Jose Thomas vs Priya Varma regarding Rent Control Petition

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-08-09
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jose Thomas, the petitioner, is seeking possession of a commercial building from Priya Varma, the respondent. The court dismissed the rent control petition as not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the rent control petition as the respondent surrendered the vacant possession of the property.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the rent control petition as the respondent surrendered the vacant possession of the property.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jose Thomas
Party Age
73
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Priya Varma
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Karthika Maria
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Veena Raveendran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shinto Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Leah Rachel Ninan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Navya Seby Roll
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shyni William
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rama Narayana Prbhu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sudha Ramnarayan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The rent control petition was dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Counsel for the petitioner also endorsed as not pressed in the rent control petition. Hence, rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jose Thomas vs Priya Varma regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Jose Thomas vs Priya Varma regarding Rent Control Petition

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 08/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between V.K.Jayachandran vs Nisha M.V regarding petition under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control)Act, 1965
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown
Case between Liya George vs Sulaiman regarding Petition under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965
THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Dismissed
Case between Robin Thomas Vaidyan vs RAHA Ayurveda Hospital et al regarding eviction
Court of the Third Additional Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Rent Control Petition Unknown
Case between Mrs. Susan Jacob John @ Susan John & Dr. Maria Kuriakose vs Mr. Annekot Ramadasan Padmakumar regarding Petition filed under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala (Buildings Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965
The Third Additional Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Munir Gul Mohammed Sait et al vs K.M. Abdulla et al regarding Rent Control Petition
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown