Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 184/2025

Case between Jose A.D vs Maju Jacob regarding injunction of property

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-05-22
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jose A.D is the plaintiff seeking an injunction against Maju Jacob to prevent him from trespassing and interfering with his property. The dispute revolves around property boundaries and alleged encroachments by the defendant.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for an interim injunction, granting the plaintiff protection against the defendant's actions concerning the disputed property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad interim order of injunction granted is made absolute until the disposal of the suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found a prima facie case in favor of the plaintiff and noted that the balance of convenience weighed in his favor.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Jose A.D (66 years) Anamthuruthil house, Thevarmadom Lane, Vennala P.O, Edappally south village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 028

Defendants

Maju Jacob (60 years) Pulithitta house, Thevaramadom Lane, Vennala P.O, Edappally south village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 028

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner sought a decree of permanent injunction against the defendant restraining him from trespassing into the plaint schedule property, demolishing any portion of the compound wall, or interfering in any manner with the possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed. Ad interim order of injunction granted is made absolute until the disposal of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Document
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These exhibits were marked from the side of the plaintiff for the purpose of this order in this interim application.
Reference:
Ext.A1 to A5
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This report was marked during the hearing and is referenced in the court's considerations.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases