Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 602/2022

Case between Jones Kurian vs The District Collector et al regarding dismissal of suit due to non-appearance.

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-09-16
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jones Kurian is the plaintiff, and The District Collector and others are the defendants. The case was dismissed as the plaintiff was not present or ready for evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to be ready for evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to be ready for evidence.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was not present or ready for evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was not present or ready for evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff not present or ready for evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

As the plaintiff is not present or ready for evidence in listed case, suit dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jones Kurian
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The District Collector, Ernakulam
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Thahasildar, Kanayannoor Taluk
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Superintendent, Survey and Land Records
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Village Officer, Mulamthuruthy Village
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Secretary Mulamthuruthy Grama Panchayath
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T. B Thankappan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T. T Harikumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Viji V. P
Appearance Type
Government Pleader
Law Firm
Addl. Govt. Pleader
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V. A Johnson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Cyriac Tom
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Harikrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Naveen A Varkey
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was not present or ready for evidence.
Evidence:
As the plaintiff is not present or ready for evidence in listed case, suit dismissed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jones Kurian vs The District Collector et al regarding dismissal of suit due to non-appearance.
Case Code Year
Case between Jones Kurian vs The District Collector et al regarding dismissal of suit due to non-appearance.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won