Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 602/2022

Case between Jones Kurian vs The District Collector et al regarding dismissal of suit due to non-appearance.

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-09-16
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jones Kurian is the plaintiff, and The District Collector and others are the defendants. The case was dismissed as the plaintiff was not present or ready for evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to be ready for evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was not present or ready for evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

As the plaintiff is not present or ready for evidence in listed case, suit dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Jones Kurian (53 years years) Bethaniya, Palipuram House, Mulamthuruthy P.O, Kanayanoor Taluk

Defendants

The District Collector, Ernakulam (Age not specified years) Office of the District Collector, Kakkanad, Ernakulam District, PIN : 682 011 The Thahasildar, Kanayannoor Taluk (Age not specified years) Ernakulam District The Superintendent, Survey and Land Records (Age not specified years) Collectorate, Ernakulam, PIN : 682 011 The Village Officer, Mulamthuruthy Village (Age not specified years) Kanayannoor Taluk Pin : 682 011 The Secretary Mulamthuruthy Grama Panchayath (Age not specified years) Office of the Mulamthuruthy Panchayath, Mulamthuruthy, PIN : 682 314

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was not present or ready for evidence.
Evidence:
As the plaintiff is not present or ready for evidence in listed case, suit dismissed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases