Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 87/2019

Case between Jolly Thomas et al vs Sorly Thomas regarding dismissal of suit.

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-09-09
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jolly Thomas and Rovin Jolly are the plaintiffs, while Sorly Thomas is the defendant. The plaintiffs failed to appear in court, leading to the dismissal of their suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiffs were not present in court, leading to the dismissal of their suit with costs awarded to the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs' absence in court led to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit therefore dismissed with costs to defendants.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Jolly Thomas (66 years) Edampadath House, Pangarappilly P. O, Thuruthikkara, Ernakulam – 682 314 Rovin Jolly (32 years) Edampadath House, Pangarappilly P. O, Thuruthikkara, Ernakulam – 682 314

Defendants

Sorly Thomas (64 years) Edampadath House, Pangarappilly P. O, Thuruthikkara, Ernakulam – 682 314

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's continuous absence.
Evidence:
Suit therefore dismissed with costs to defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases