Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 8/2024

Case between Jolly Paul vs Jones Paul regarding Balance Court Fee

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-08-12
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jolly Paul is the plaintiff and Jones Paul is the defendant. The suit was heard regarding the balance court fee, but the plaintiff was absent and no representation was made.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the defendant due to the absence of the plaintiff and non-payment of the balance court fee. The suit was rejected.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not make any representation to the court.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit was heard regarding the balance court fee, but the plaintiff was absent and no representation was made. The court stated the suit was rejected.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Jolly Paul (77 years) Kottoor House, N F Gate, Tripunithura, Kochi, Pin 682 301, Nadama Village, Kanyannur Taluk

Defendants

Jones Paul (71 years) Kottoot House, N F Gate, Tripunithura, Ernakulam, Pin 682 301, Nadama Village, Kanayannur Taluk

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases