Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 8/2024

Case between Jolly Paul vs Jones Paul regarding Balance Court Fee

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-08-12
Duration
Case Closed
Mon, 08/12/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jolly Paul is the plaintiff and Jones Paul is the defendant. The suit was heard regarding the balance court fee, but the plaintiff was absent and no representation was made.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the defendant due to the absence of the plaintiff and non-payment of the balance court fee. The suit was rejected.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the defendant due to the absence of the plaintiff and non-payment of the balance court fee. The suit was rejected.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not make any representation to the court.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and did not make any representation to the court.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was absent and did not make any representation to the court.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit was heard regarding the balance court fee, but the plaintiff was absent and no representation was made. The court stated the suit was rejected.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jolly Paul
Party Age
77
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jones Paul
Party Age
71
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.C Charles
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Poly Mathai
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Renju A. T
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vimal K Charles
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Saju Thomas N
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Mathew Varghese
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Joe Pollayil
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Radhakrishnan M.K
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jolly Paul vs Jones Paul regarding Balance Court Fee
Case Code Year
Case between Jolly Paul vs Jones Paul regarding Balance Court Fee

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
Mon, 08/12/2024 - 12:00
From
Thu, 08/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won