E.P. No. 379/2025

Case between Jojo Paul vs Maya Prasanth regarding enforcement of decree

Court

THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM

Judge

Sri. Rohit Nandakumar

Order Date

2025-11-28

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jojo Paul is the decree holder seeking enforcement of a decree against Maya Prasanth, the judgment debtor. The court dismissed the petition due to the decree holder's absence.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Execution Petition

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the execution petition due to the absence of the decree holder, Jojo Paul.

Key Reasoning:
The decree holder was absent despite specific direction to appear.

Why Defendant Won:
The decree holder was absent despite specific direction to appear.

Supporting Evidence

Decree holder absent. No representation. Decree Holder absent despite specific direction to appear.

Judgment Evidence:

This petition has come up for hearing before me on 28.11.2025 and the court on the same day passed the following:- ORDER Decree holder absent. No representation. Decree Holder absent despite specific direction to appear. Decree holder is continuously absent without representation. Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Jojo Paul

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Maya Prasanth

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Decree Holder
Advocate Name: Jose Kuriakose
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

The decree holder was absent and the case was dismissed.

Evidence:

Decree holder absent. No representation. Decree Holder absent despite specific direction to appear. Decree holder is continuously absent without representation. Dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification