Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
E.P. No. 379/2025

Case between Jojo Paul vs Maya Prasanth regarding enforcement of decree

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-11-28
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jojo Paul is the decree holder seeking enforcement of a decree against Maya Prasanth, the judgment debtor. The court dismissed the petition due to the decree holder's absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the execution petition due to the absence of the decree holder, Jojo Paul.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The decree holder was absent despite specific direction to appear.

Judgment Evidence:

This petition has come up for hearing before me on 28.11.2025 and the court on the same day passed the following:- ORDER Decree holder absent. No representation. Decree Holder absent despite specific direction to appear. Decree holder is continuously absent without representation. Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Jojo Paul (Age not specified years) Palathinkal House, Poonithura Village, Poonithura P.O., Ernakulam District.

Defendants

Maya Prasanth (Age not specified years) Raji Bhavan, Palliyil Lane, Jayanthi Road, Maradu P.O.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The decree holder was absent and the case was dismissed.
Evidence:
Decree holder absent. No representation. Decree Holder absent despite specific direction to appear. Decree holder is continuously absent without representation. Dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases