Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 349/2025

Case between Joby John.E vs Thomas. C. Kurian regarding temporary injunction

Court
Additional Munsiff's Court
Judge
Smt. Indu. P. Raj
Order Date
2025-09-17
Duration
Case Code No.
349
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Joby John.E filed a petition for a temporary injunction against Thomas. C. Kurian. The petition seeks to prevent further obstruction related to a property matter.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an ad interim injunction in favor of Joby John.E to prevent Thomas. C. Kurian from obstructing property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad interim injunction granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad interim injunction in favor of Joby John.E to prevent Thomas. C. Kurian from obstructing property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
A prima facie case has been made out and further notice would cause delay.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that a prima facie case has been made out and if notice issued delay will occurred and the same would defeat the very purpose of the above application.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence ad interim injunction is granted and restraining the Counter Petitioner from making any further obstruction in Plaint Schedule item No:2 property or from making any further construction there in until further order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Joby John.E
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thomas. C. Kurian
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sajan. A. Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K. A. Bhadran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Ad interim injunction granted restraining the Counter Petitioner from making any further obstruction in Plaint Schedule item No:2 property or from making any further construction there in until further order.
Evidence:
Hence ad interim injunction is granted and restraining the Counter Petitioner from making any further obstruction in Plaint Schedule item No:2 property or from making any further construction there in until further order.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between State Bank of India vs Nishana K C regarding decree of suit
Munsiff Court/Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Asset Sapphire Apartment Owners Association vs Amal Shaji et al regarding petition for document production
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Aniyamma Joseph et al vs Akhil Joseph et al regarding civil matters.
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ajitha Jibi vs Sherin Mathew et al regarding compromise petition.
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Surendran et al vs Daniel. K.P. et al regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won