Case Summary
The plaintiff, JK ADS XV, is an advertising firm seeking payment for services rendered in advertising a film produced by the defendant, S. Square Cinemas. The defendant claims they had only engaged the plaintiff for 11 hoardings for a reduced period and disputes the amount owed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for non-payment of dues, finding insufficient evidence to support their claims regarding the service provided.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to prove their case and produce necessary documentation.
The plaintiff failed to prove their case and produce necessary documentation.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to prove their case and produce necessary documentation.
The plaintiff failed to prove their case and produce necessary documentation.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff fails to produce the quotation for 33 hoardings as claimed and could not establish their entitlement to relief.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, suit dismissed with the costs of plaintiff.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- JK ADS XV
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vijayakumar
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sabu.G.S
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- S. Square Cinemas
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shimjith
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Power of Attorney, Copy of Quotation orders, Copy of Invoice/Cash Bill, Advocate Notice
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Kalluvathukkal C.Sunilkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Thampi.V.S.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Muhammed Ziyad
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Plaintiff seeks to recover the amount due from the defendant for services rendered.
Evidence:
Thus, Issue No.1 is found against the plaintiff.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Power of Attorney
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the authority of the Power of Attorney Holder to represent the plaintiff in this case.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Quotation order
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This quotation lists 30 locations for the advertisement hoardings as requested by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Quotation order
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This additional quotation shows 10 more locations for hoardings as requested by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Invoice/Cash Bill
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the bill issued by the plaintiff for the services provided, claiming an amount of Rs. 4,80,720.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type:
Reply Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice is a response from the defendant acknowledging the transaction while disputing the number of hoardings and the duration.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type:
Photos
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
These photos serve as evidence of the hoardings displayed, though their timeliness and location are unclear.
Reference:
Ext.A12(a) to A12(h)
Document Type:
Work Order
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The work order details the agreement and amount payable, forming the basis for the contract between the parties.
Reference:
Ext.A15
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between JK ADS XV vs S. Square Cinemas regarding Realisation of Money
Case Code Year
Case between JK ADS XV vs S. Square Cinemas regarding Realisation of Money