Case Summary
Jincy. K.K filed a suit against Akbar.N.S for a permanent prohibitory injunction. Both parties settled the matter and the suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as not pressed since the issues had been settled between the parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Not applicable
Judgment Evidence:
In the result suit is dismissed as not pressed and settled.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jincy. K.K
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Akbar.N.S
- Party Age
- 40
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Najmal.A.H.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jasmine.V.H
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Shiji.P.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Thasnimol.T.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Suhail Marikar.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit is for permanent prohibitory injunction.
Evidence:
the plaintiff does not intend to proceed the matter further.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jincy. K.K vs Akbar.N.S regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Jincy. K.K vs Akbar.N.S regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement