Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 874/2023

Case between Jijo T.M vs Selix et al regarding a suit rejection

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-12-03
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Jijo T.M, filed a suit which was rejected by the court. The defendants included Selix and others, with one defendant being represented.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit filed by the plaintiff was rejected on the grounds of no representation and non-payment of balance court fees.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff had no representation and did not pay the required court fees.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit rejected. All pending I.A’s stand closed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Jijo T.M (53 years years) Thathanat House, Main Road, Thrippunithura, Nadama Village, Ernakulam District – 682 301.

Defendants

Selix (51 years years) Thaikoottathil House, House No. XIII/93, Thiruvankulam Village, Irumpanam P.O, Thripunithura, Ernakulam District – 682 309. Ruksana Bhagyavathi @ Sona (37 years years) Athipozhi, 17/1556, Mundamveli, Kochi – 683 002. Muhammed Rafi (52 years years) Puthiyaveetil House, Opposite Bhavens Hotel, Chilanka, Vadanappally, Thrissur District – 680 614. Sajeer (38 years years) Rayammarakkar Veetil House, Thrithallur, Vadanappally, Thrissur District- 680 619.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases