Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 874/2023

Case between Jijo T.M vs Selix et al regarding a suit rejection

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-12-03
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Jijo T.M, filed a suit which was rejected by the court. The defendants included Selix and others, with one defendant being represented.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit filed by the plaintiff was rejected on the grounds of no representation and non-payment of balance court fees.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by the plaintiff was rejected on the grounds of no representation and non-payment of balance court fees.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff had no representation and did not pay the required court fees.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff had no representation and did not pay the required court fees.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff no representation. Balance Court Fee not paid.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit rejected. All pending I.A’s stand closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jijo T.M
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Selix
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ruksana Bhagyavathi @ Sona
Party Age
37
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammed Rafi
Party Age
52
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sajeer
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Deepak Mohan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anumon V. S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Syamon K. K
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Latheesh Sebastian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Binitha James
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jijo T.M vs Selix et al regarding a suit rejection
Case Code Year
Case between Jijo T.M vs Selix et al regarding a suit rejection

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 12/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won