Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 200/2024

Case between Jerimon James vs Tormac Marine (OPC) Private Ltd., Binu Chandrasekharan Nair, HDFC Bank Ltd, Axis Bank Ltd. regarding civil suit.

Court
THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-09-04
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jerimon James filed a suit against Tormac Marine (OPC) Private Ltd. and others. The court found that the plaintiff was not interested in prosecuting the suit, leading to its dismissal.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit because the plaintiff failed to appear for the hearing and showed no interest in prosecuting the case.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not appear and showed no interest in continuing the case.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Jerimon James (37 years years) Kanigamparambil house, Karikattuthuruthu, Chennur, Chittoot, Ernakulam, Kerala – 682 027

Defendants

Tormac Marine (OPC) Private Ltd. (Age not specified years) Mietro Pillar 720, the office 4th floor Jose Annex, Jos Junction, MG road, Kochi, Ernkalam, Kerala, India, Pin – 682 016 Binu Chandrasekharan Nair (Age not specified years) Changalapallil house, Pathiyoor, Kayamkulam, Keerikkad, Alappuzha – 690 508 HDFC Bank Ltd (Age not specified years) Kodungallur Branch, Thrissur District – 680 664 Axis Bank Ltd. (Age not specified years) Ernkulam Branch, Chicago Plaza, M.G.Road, Ernakulam District – 682 035

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's lack of interest in prosecuting the case.
Evidence:
the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases