Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1188/2020

Case between Jenifer Jacob vs Jacob Gomez et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-06-30
Duration
approximately-4 years 18 days
Case Code No.
1188
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jenifer Jacob is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Jacob Gomez and Girly Hectus regarding possession of a residential property. The plaintiff claims to have been in continuous and peaceful possession of the property, while the defendants are accused of attempting to unlawfully dispossess her.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court partly decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendants from unlawfully dispossessing her from the property. The judgment emphasized the necessity of protecting the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the building.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendants be perpetually restrained from obstructing or harassing the plaintiff's possession of the building.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court partly decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendants from unlawfully dispossessing her from the property. The judgment emphasized the necessity of protecting the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the building.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established a legal right and actual possession over the property, necessitating protection against unlawful dispossession.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established a legal right and actual possession over the property, necessitating protection against unlawful dispossession.
Supporting Evidence
It is clear that the plaintiff has been in continuous and peaceful possession of the property which belongs to the 1st defendant, her father, as per the settlement deed in his favour. The balance of convenience favours the plaintiff since she has a lawful right and actual possession of the property.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is partly decreed as follows: (a) Let the defendants be perpetually restrained from obstructing or in any way harassing the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the plaint schedule building or from forcibly dispossessing the plaintiff from the plaint schedule building without resorting to due process of law.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jenifer Jacob
Party Age
28
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jacob Gomez
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Girly Hectus
Party Age
74
Plaintiffs Documents
Marriage invitation letter, Copy of Settlement Deed No.535/2011
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Francis Gomez
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought an injunction to prevent the defendants from dispossessing her from the property.
Evidence:
the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of permanent injunction to protect her possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Marriage invitation letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Presented as evidence to establish the plaintiff's connection to the property and personal circumstances.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates the plaintiff's legal claim to the property through the 1st defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Commission report & Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Marked as court exhibits to support the evidence presented regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.C1 & C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2020

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Fri, 09/25/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won