Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 255/2025

Case between Jeni Kurian vs Dinesh Shandilya et al regarding restraining destruction of the wall.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-12-20
Duration
approximately-0 years 28 days
Case Code No.
255
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jeni Kurian filed a petition to restrain the defendants from destroying a wall. The case is linked to similar proceedings in the High Court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found the petition cannot be entertained at this stage due to similar cases pending in the High Court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found the petition cannot be entertained at this stage due to similar cases pending in the High Court.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

As the subject matter in the present suit is the same subject matter in the case pending consideration before the Hon’ble High Court, this petition cannot be entertained at this stage.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jeni Kurian
Party Age
51
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dinesh Shandilya
Party Age
50
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Binilal Shandilya
Party Age
58
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K A Bhadran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Joby Gopal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Kannan Mohan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Manish Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Johnson Allese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sajan Thampan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Tom Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Deepu Anil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aswin P Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anandhu S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Devananda S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The petitioner requested to restrain the respondent from destructing the wall.
Evidence:
As the subject matter in the present suit is the same subject matter in the case pending consideration before the Hon’ble High Court, this petition cannot be entertained at this stage.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between State Bank of India vs Nishana K C regarding decree of suit
Munsiff Court/Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Asset Sapphire Apartment Owners Association vs Amal Shaji et al regarding petition for document production
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Aniyamma Joseph et al vs Akhil Joseph et al regarding civil matters.
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ajitha Jibi vs Sherin Mathew et al regarding compromise petition.
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Surendran et al vs Daniel. K.P. et al regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won