Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.938/2021

Case between Jeevan Kumar.M.T vs Raju et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
II Additional Munsiff
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-02-23
Duration
approximately-2 years 6 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jeevan Kumar.M.T is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Raju and others regarding obstruction of his property pathway. The defendants allegedly constructed a latrine that encroaches on this pathway, hindering the plaintiff's use.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendants from obstructing the plaintiff's enjoyment of the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants from carrying out any constructions or obstructing the enjoyment of the pathway.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the plaintiff's case established based on unchallenged evidence regarding the obstruction on the pathway.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: Defendants are restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from carrying out any constructions in plaint B schedule property or obstructing the enjoyment of the same by plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Jeevan Kumar.M.T (53 years) Madathilparambil House, Kezhuppilly Road, Kadavanthra, Kochi – 682 020

Defendants

Raju (40 years) Konnoth Parambil Thittayil, Kezhuppilly Road, Kadavanthra, Kochi – 682 020 Thankachan (56 years) Konnoth Parambil Thittayil, Kezhuppilly Road, Kadavanthra, Kochi, Pin – 682 020 Shaji (50 years) Konnoth Parambil Thittayil, Kezhuppilly Road, Kadavanthra, Kochi – 682 020

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are restrained from carrying out any constructions in plaint B schedule property or obstructing the enjoyment of the same by plaintiff.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed as follows: Defendants are restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from carrying out any constructions in plaint B schedule property or obstructing the enjoyment of the same by plaintiff.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are directed to pay costs of the suit to plaintiff.
Evidence:
Defendants are directed to pay costs of the suit to plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Identified plaintiff B schedule as the pathway to plaint A schedule property and reported waste articles and leakage affecting the pathway.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Photographs
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Fortified the findings of Ext.C1 commission report regarding the obstruction in the pathway.
Reference:
Ext.C1 series

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 08/20/2021 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases