Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 625/2020

Case between JedeshUmmar Hamza vs Boby Tharian et al regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction and other reliefs.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-07-17
Duration
approximately-1 year 5 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

JedeshUmmar Hamza is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Boby Tharian and MahaSubair for obstructing his right of way to his property. The defendants unlawfully constructed obstacles on the pathway used by the plaintiff, leading to this lawsuit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff failed to establish any legal right over the plaint schedule properties. Consequently, both the permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction sought by the plaintiff were not granted.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not establish a threat to or the possibility of infringement of his legal right over the properties in question.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

JedeshUmmar Hamza (37 years) House No.64/73 Lissy Convent Road, Ernakulam, Kochi-682 018.

Defendants

Boby Tharian (51 years) House No.64/731, Flat No.1, 2 nd floor of 2 storied building, Near KPB House, Lissie Convent Road, Ernakulam North, Pin-682 018. MahaSubair (41 years) Kallingal House, Chakkalaparambu, Puthiya Road, Kaloor, Ernakulam-682 017.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from parking their vehicles or constructing any structures obstructing the use of the B Schedule private way.
Evidence:
Since the plaintiffs failed to establish any legal right over plaint schedule properties, he is not entitled to relief of permanent prohibitory injunction.
Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff prayed for a decree of mandatory injunction directing the removal of the water tank and meter chamber.
Evidence:
Given that the plaintiff has not established any legal right over, the plaint schedule properties, such a relief also cannot be allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Registered Sale Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of registered sale deed No. 2371/2019 of Ernakulam SRO.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Registered Sale Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of registered sale deed No. 108/1989 of Ernakulam SRO.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Registered Sale Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of registered sale deed No. 109/1989 of Ernakulam SRO.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Quick Facts

Location
ERNAKULAM
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases