Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 761/2024

Case between Jayasankar Balakrishnan vs Manjusha M V regarding recovery of possession and realization of money

Court
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-04-11
Duration
approximately-5 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a petition by the defendant, Manjusha M V, to lift the order of attachment on her property. The plaintiff, Jayasankar Balakrishnan, sought to attach the property as security for a monetary claim.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for lifting the order of attachment on the defendant's property, deeming the security furnished sufficient to cover the plaintiff's claim. The attached property will be released based on the fixed deposit provided as security.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Property attached is released from attachment on accepting FD for Rs. 1,27,070/- with Union Bank, Tripunithura branch as security until further orders.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for lifting the order of attachment on the defendant's property, deeming the security furnished sufficient to cover the plaintiff's claim. The attached property will be released based on the fixed deposit provided as security.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that sufficient security was furnished to withdraw the attachment as per the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that sufficient security was furnished to withdraw the attachment as per the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Supporting Evidence
The security furnished by petitioner is sufficient to meet the amount claimed in the plaint and the amount for which attachment is effected. Therefore, this court has power to withdraw attachment under O.38 R.6(2) of CPC when sufficient security is furnished.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, Petition is allowed. Property attached as per Order in IA.No.3/2024 dated 28.10.2024 is released from attachment on accepting FD for Rs. 1,27,070/- with Union Bank, Tripunithura branch in the name of defendant dated 01.11.2024 as security until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jayasankar Balakrishnan
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manjusha M V
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
FD receipt with lien marked for a sum equivalent to plaint claim.

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M N Manmadan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rajagopalan A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Basil Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ninan John
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sanjana Sara Varghese Annie
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petition is allowed for the release of property from attachment.
Evidence:
Accordingly, I am satisfied that the above petition is liable to be allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jayasankar Balakrishnan vs Manjusha M V regarding recovery of possession and realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Jayasankar Balakrishnan vs Manjusha M V regarding recovery of possession and realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won