Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.No.761/2024

Case between Jayasankar Balakrishnan vs Manjusha M V regarding attachment before judgment

Court
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-10-28
Duration
Case Code No.
761
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Jayasankar Balakrishnan, is seeking to attach the property of the respondent Manjusha M V before judgment due to unpaid rent. The petitioner claims the respondent has refused to execute a lease deed after constructing a commercial shed on the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for attachment and directed the respondent to furnish security for the amount of Rs.1,27,070.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Property of the respondent scheduled is conditionally attached.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for attachment and directed the respondent to furnish security for the amount of Rs.1,27,070.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court was satisfied that the petitioner established a prima facie case demonstrating intent by the respondent to defeat the execution of a potential decree.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the above petition is liable to be allowed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, 1)The above petition is allowed. Property of the respondent scheduled is conditionally attached.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jayasankar Balakrishnan
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manjusha M V
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Basil Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ninan John
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Arya A R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sanjana Sara Varghese Annie
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rajagopalan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M N Manmadhan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Attachment
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The property of the respondent is conditionally attached.
Evidence:
In the result, 1) The above petition is allowed. Property of the respondent scheduled is conditionally attached.
Relief Type: Security Furnishing
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to furnish security for Rs.1,27,070/-.
Evidence:
Respondent is directed to furnish security for Rs.1,27,070/-.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the petitioner's ownership of the schedule property.
Reference:
No.1768/2012
Document Type: MoU
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
The Memorandum of Understanding outlines the terms of leasing and construction relating to the schedule property.
Reference:
null
Document Type: Affidavit
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The affidavit from the plaintiff supports the claim for attachment before judgment.
Reference:
null

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 10/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Parthan C P vs Shaji regarding temporary injunction and recovery of possession
II Additional Munsiff Court
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Jayadeep et al vs Keerthi Nagar Housing Co Operative Society et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
II Additional Munsiff Court
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between YWCA Ernakulam et al vs Soumini Jayan et al regarding arbitration referral
II Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Mr. Nishan Mohammed vs Trinity World Apartment Owners Association et al regarding temporary injunction.
II Additional Munsiff Court
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Alex Vachaparambil and Tsarina Vacha vs Prestige Neptunes Courtyard Owners Association regarding temporary injunction
II Additional Munsiff Court
Injunction Plaintiff Won