Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S.No.761/2024

Case between Jayasankar Balakrishnan vs Manjusha M V regarding attachment before judgment

Court
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-10-28
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Jayasankar Balakrishnan, is seeking to attach the property of the respondent Manjusha M V before judgment due to unpaid rent. The petitioner claims the respondent has refused to execute a lease deed after constructing a commercial shed on the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for attachment and directed the respondent to furnish security for the amount of Rs.1,27,070.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Property of the respondent scheduled is conditionally attached.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court was satisfied that the petitioner established a prima facie case demonstrating intent by the respondent to defeat the execution of a potential decree.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, 1)The above petition is allowed. Property of the respondent scheduled is conditionally attached.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Jayasankar Balakrishnan (38 years) Shankers, Parapallil lane, Hill Palace, Thiruvankulam P O, Ernakulam, Pin- 682305

Defendants

Manjusha M V (45 years) Valiyaparambath House, Sanskrit College Road, Thripunithura P O, Ernakulam, Pin- 682301

Reliefs

Relief Type: Attachment
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The property of the respondent is conditionally attached.
Evidence:
In the result, 1) The above petition is allowed. Property of the respondent scheduled is conditionally attached.
Relief Type: Security Furnishing
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to furnish security for Rs.1,27,070/-.
Evidence:
Respondent is directed to furnish security for Rs.1,27,070/-.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the petitioner's ownership of the schedule property.
Reference:
No.1768/2012
Document Type: MoU
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
The Memorandum of Understanding outlines the terms of leasing and construction relating to the schedule property.
Reference:
null
Document Type: Affidavit
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The affidavit from the plaintiff supports the claim for attachment before judgment.
Reference:
null

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases