Case Summary
The case involves a counter claim where both parties, Jayaprakash and Pathumuthu, were absent from the proceedings. Consequently, the counter claim was dismissed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the counter claim as neither party represented themselves. The counter claim plaintiff and defendant were both absent.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Counter claim is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jayaprakash
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pathumuthu
- Relation
- W/o late Haneefa
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Arun V G
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt Jaya Ragi V S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Pramod Kumar.G.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.N Binu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Priya S S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2015