Case Summary
The plaintiff, Jayanthi.S., filed a suit for injunction against the defendant, Shameer.A. The case was heard in court on January 7, 2025.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was absent and failed to present evidence, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was not represented and called absent, causing the suit to be dismissed for default.
The plaintiff was not represented and called absent, causing the suit to be dismissed for default.
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
As the plaintiff not ready to adduce any evidence, suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jayanthi.S.
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shameer.A.
- Party Age
- 35
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sunil Kumar & Ziad
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Suit dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not represented and not ready to adduce any evidence.
Evidence:
Plaintiff not represented and called absent. Today the case is posted for adducing exparte evidence. As the plaintiff not ready to adduce any evidence, suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jayanthi.S. vs Shameer.A. regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Jayanthi.S. vs Shameer.A. regarding Injunction