Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 844/2019

Case between Jayan V.T vs Sreedevi K.T regarding suit dismissal for default

Court
COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-09-30
Duration
approximately-5 years 0 days
Case Closed
Mon, 09/30/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jayan V.T initiated a suit against Sreedevi K.T. The case was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of representation over five posting dates.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's repeated absence at hearings.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's repeated absence at hearings.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to appear and provide representation despite multiple opportunities.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to appear and provide representation despite multiple opportunities.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff absent continuously for 5 posting dates. No representation also.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jayan V.T
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreedevi K.T
Party Age
47
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Madhusoodanan K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Paul T.G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mathew Jacob
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Syriac Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anil S Raj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anila Peter
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Simi S Ali
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Radhika Rajasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arshid M.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Bahadurshah
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Saritha K.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent continuously for 5 posting dates. No representation also.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jayan V.T vs Sreedevi K.T regarding suit dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Jayan V.T vs Sreedevi K.T regarding suit dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 09/30/2024 - 12:00
From
Sun, 09/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Mon, 09/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won