Case Summary
The plaintiff, Jayakumar.V.N., filed a suit against the defendant, Shafeek.N. The case was heard and the court rejected the plaint due to non-remittance of balance court fee.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaint was rejected due to the plaintiff's failure to remit the balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff failed to remit the required court fee.
Plaintiff failed to remit the required court fee.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff failed to remit the required court fee.
Plaintiff failed to remit the required court fee.
Supporting Evidence
No balance court fee seen remitted.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence plaint is rejected. For non remittance of balance court fee.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jayakumar.V.N.
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shafeek.N
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Jagath Sivaraj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Krishna Prasad.S.R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.S.Arunkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaint is rejected due to non-remittance of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Hence plaint is rejected. For non remittance of balance court fee.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023