Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1534/2017

Case between Jayakumari @ Jeenath Beegum vs Ushakumari regarding evidence recording through advocate commissioner

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-03-26
Duration
approximately-7 years 10 months
Case Code No.
1534
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jayakumari @ Jeenath Beegum, the plaintiff, is suffering from various ailments and requests to record her evidence through an advocate commissioner. Ushakumari, the defendant, contests this application, asserting that the plaintiff's claims of illness are false.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the application for the plaintiff to record her evidence through an advocate commissioner, considering her medical condition.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Appointment of advocate commissioner to record evidence
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the application for the plaintiff to record her evidence through an advocate commissioner, considering her medical condition.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the plaintiff's health issues credible and permissible under Order 26 Rule 1.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found the plaintiff's health issues credible and permissible under Order 26 Rule 1.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has also produced Medical Certificate to substantiate her claim.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence find it proper to appoint as advocate commissioner to record her evidence in the interest of justice.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jayakumari @ Jeenath Beegum
Party Age
61
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ushakumari
Party Age
58
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Medical Certificate
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Anoop Rajendran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.V.G.Jayagopan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Pratheesh Mohan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Court
Advocate Name
Adv.Ganga
Appearance Type
Government Pleader

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Application filed by plaintiff to record her evidence through an advocate commissioner due to inability to be physically present in court.
Evidence:
Hence find it proper to appoint as advocate commissioner to record her evidence in the interest of justice.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Medical Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The plaintiff produced a medical certificate to substantiate her claim regarding her inability to physically present herself in court.
Reference:
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court is acting upon the commission for examination of witness as per Order 26 Rule 1.
Reference:
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Both sides provided oral evidence regarding the plaintiff's health condition.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2017

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 05/01/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won