Case Summary
Jasmine, the plaintiff, filed a suit against George C.X, the defendant. The court rejected the plaint due to non-payment of balance court fees.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected due to non-payment of court fees.
The plaint was rejected due to non-payment of court fees.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected due to non-payment of court fees.
The plaint was rejected due to non-payment of court fees.
Supporting Evidence
Balance Court Fee not paid.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jasmine
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- George C.X
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- V. A Johnson
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- S. Vaidhyanathan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sachin Janoh Ambatt
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Harikrishnan. S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Biju George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaint was rejected due to non-payment of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Balance Court Fee not paid. Hence plaint rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jasmine vs George C.X regarding rejection of plaint due to unpaid court fees.
Case Code Year
Case between Jasmine vs George C.X regarding rejection of plaint due to unpaid court fees.