Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 977/2021

Case between Jasmin Dileep vs K.M.Raju regarding non prosecution of the suit

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-08-02
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jasmin Dileep is the plaintiff and K.M.Raju is the defendant. The case was dismissed for non prosecution as the plaintiff remained absent during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation. No proof affidavit was filed by the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is dismissed for non prosecution.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

JASMIN DILEEP (48 years) Muttil House, Chempu.P.O, Chempu Village, Vaikom Taluk, Kottayam District, Pin 686608

Defendants

K.M.RAJU (60 years) Koluthakkottil House, Kanjiramattam Desom, Kanjiramattom .P.O Amaballoor Village, Kanayannore Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin-682315

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for non prosecution.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for non prosecution.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases