Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No. 123/2022

Case between JANU vs BAHULEYAN @ BABU regarding petition for reconsideration.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan.B
Order Date
2025-02-07
Duration
Case Code No.
123
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

JANU, the plaintiff, is seeking a reconsideration of a petition against BAHULEYAN @ BABU, the defendant. The court allowed the petition and remitted the commission report back to the Advocate Commissioner.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition was allowed by the court.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Commission Report and plan remitted back to the Advocate Commissioner.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed by the court.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Petition allowed. Commission Report and plan remitted back to the Advocate Commissioner to file fresh report.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
JANU
Party Age
53
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
BAHULEYAN @ BABU
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M. Ragesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Arunkumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petition allowed.
Evidence:
Petition allowed. Commission Report and plan remitted back to the Advocate Commissioner to file fresh report.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Deposit Commission Batta.
Evidence:
Deposit Commission Batta of Rs. 5,000/- before the court.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court allowed the petition and remitted the Commission Report and plan back to the Advocate Commissioner to file a fresh report.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District, Kerala
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between SYNDICATE BANK vs ADARSH. A. C et al regarding dismissal of suit.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between JANU vs BAHULEYAN @ BABU regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thondarkulangara Korumbathi et al vs Thondarkulangara Chekkon et al regarding preliminary decree
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji et al vs Haris et al regarding permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Alikkutty. T. P vs Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji regarding dismissal for default
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won