Case Summary
JANU. A. P is the petitioner, while NANU and others are the respondents. The case involves a petition for property delivery under civil procedure.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Property delivered
Case Type
Civil Case
Final Judgment
No
The petition for property delivery was heard, and the court recorded full satisfaction with the property delivered.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the petition valid under the appropriate legal provisions.
The court found the petition valid under the appropriate legal provisions.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found the petition valid under the appropriate legal provisions.
The court found the petition valid under the appropriate legal provisions.
Supporting Evidence
The court found that the petition fulfilled the necessary legal framework for property delivery.
Judgment Evidence:
This petition filed under Order XXI Rule 35 of the code of Civil Procedure 1908. Property delivered. Full satisfaction recorded. EP closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- JANU. A. P
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- NANU
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- POKKI @ DEVI
- Party Age
- 74
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- KALLYANI
- Party Age
- 85
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- BALAN
- Party Age
- 69
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- GOURI
- Party Age
- 69
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Court petition, delivery receipt.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K. K. Ratheesh Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2025