Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 803/2022

Case between Janish P.A. vs Kodak Mahindra Bank Ltd. et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-11-11
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Janish P.A. is the plaintiff against Kodak Mahindra Bank Ltd. and others. The case concerns the plaintiff's continuous absence from court hearings.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of representation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to appear in court despite directions.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence this court is of the view that plaintiff is not interested to prosecute further. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Janish P.A. (39 years) Pothiyil House, Vilangu P.O., Karukulangara, Pin-683 561

Defendants

Kodak Mahindra Bank Ltd. (Age not specified years) Registered office 27BKC, C27, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra East, Mumbai-400051 Kodak Mahindra Bank Ltd. (Age not specified years) Ernakulam Branch, Kanakadamodar Building, Opp: International Hotel, Veekshanam Road, Kochi-682035 N.D.Joseph (62 years) Nellimattathil House, Tuiruvamkulam P.O, Ernakulam District, Pin-682305

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases