Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 29/2022

Case between Janardhanan Pillai vs Bindhu et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P.
Order Date
2025-06-19
Duration
approximately-2 years 6 months
Case Closed
Thu, 06/19/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Janardhanan Pillai filed a suit against Bindhu and others for encroaching into his property. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to prevent the defendants from cutting open a new pathway through his land.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a permanent prohibitory injunction in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendants from encroaching into the plaint schedule property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
A permanent prohibitory injunction is granted in favour of the plaintiff.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a permanent prohibitory injunction in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendants from encroaching into the plaint schedule property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established his case through unchallenged evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established his case through unchallenged evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Through the unchallenged oral and documentary evidence adduced by the plaintiff, the plaintiff has established this case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: A permanent prohibitory injunction is granted in favour of the plaintiff and the defendants are restrained from encroaching into the plaint schedule property and committing any act of waste therein.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Janardhanan Pillai
Party Age
71
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bindhu
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mohanan Pillai
Party Age
55
Relation
H/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sudarsanan Pillai
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Hameed
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Sale deed No. 3391/2006, Tax receipt No. KL01060708403/2021, Certified copy of Resurvey plan of resurvey No. 31/6.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S. V.Shinu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction granted in favor of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
So the plaintiff is entitled to get a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes ownership and possession of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supports the plaintiff's claim regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Resurvey Plan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Clarifies the boundaries of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Provides findings relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Visual representation relevant to the commission report.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Janardhanan Pillai vs Bindhu et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Janardhanan Pillai vs Bindhu et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram District
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Wed, 06/01/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 06/19/2025 - 12:00
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between The Federal Bank, Ltd vs Siyad. S, Haseena Beevi regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Babu Rajan N. et al vs The Government Of Kerala regarding declaration of civil death
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sheena vs Anvar et al regarding temporary injunction against illegal business.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won