Case Summary
The case involves James Mathew as the complainant against Vineetha Vijayakumar and Nishad as the accused regarding an offence related to negotiable instruments. The complaint was withdrawn by the complainant, leading to the dismissal of the case.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The complainant's petition was withdrawn, leading to the dismissal of the complaint.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence Complaint is dismissed as withdrawn under section 280 BNSS.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- James Mathew
- Relation
- Managing Partner
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vineetha Vijayakumar
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nishad
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv.Sindhu Peter
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Adv. S. Suresh Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Complaint is dismissed as withdrawn under section 280 BNSS.
Evidence:
Hence Complaint is dismissed as withdrawn under section 280 BNSS.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
S.T.
Case Code Year
2023
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act