Case Summary
Jalaja and Andavan are the plaintiffs, while Venu and Raju are the defendants. The case was dismissed for default due to the plaintiffs' absence during the trial.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs during the trial.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff's absence resulted in the dismissal of the suit.
Plaintiff's absence resulted in the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. Case listed for trial. Since plaintiff absent, suit dismissed for default.
Judgment Evidence:
Since plaintiff absent, suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jalaja
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- W/o.
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Andavan
- Party Age
- 75
- Relation
- S/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Venu
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Raju
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K M Alias
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P V Shiji
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Joby Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Since plaintiff absent, suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jalaja vs Venu regarding suit dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Jalaja vs Venu regarding suit dismissal for default.