Case Summary
Jalaja Surendran and P N Surendran are the plaintiffs seeking the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to measure and fix property boundaries. The defendants include Vijayan C N and his family members.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Appointment of Advocate Commissioner M.D. Beena and related orders for measurement of properties.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition filed by the plaintiffs for the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to measure property boundaries has been allowed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found it necessary to appoint an Advocate Commissioner for accurate boundary measurement vital for fair adjudication.
The court found it necessary to appoint an Advocate Commissioner for accurate boundary measurement vital for fair adjudication.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found it necessary to appoint an Advocate Commissioner for accurate boundary measurement vital for fair adjudication.
The court found it necessary to appoint an Advocate Commissioner for accurate boundary measurement vital for fair adjudication.
Supporting Evidence
On perusal of petition averments and records in the case, I am convinced that the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner with the assistance of a Taluk surveyor is necessary to collect valuable inputs for a proper and fair adjudication of the above suit on merits.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed on the following terms:- Advocate M.D. Beena is appointed as the Commissioner in this case and whose remuneration shall be Rs.10,000/- which shall be paid directly to the Commissioner by the plaintiffs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jalaja Surendran
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- P N Surendran
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vijayan C N
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vipinkumar C V
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sibin Kumar C V
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Seetha Devi
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Frijo K Sundaram
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Bincy Jose
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Aravind Ajith
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P B Malini Rao
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Fadiya Farza V A
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Unnimaya M R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Pooja P O
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Balram S A
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Appointment of Advocate Commissioner with assistance of Taluk Surveyor.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed on the following terms:- Advocate M.D. Beena is appointed as the Commissioner in this case.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Title deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document serves as a basis for measuring and fixing the boundaries of the properties in question.
Reference:
Document Type:
Commissioner Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The report is to be prepared by the appointed Advocate Commissioner after inspection of the property.
Reference:
Document Type:
Survey Records
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
These documents are required for executing the work of boundary fixation.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jalaja Surendran vs Vijayan C N regarding fixation of boundary and injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Jalaja Surendran vs Vijayan C N regarding fixation of boundary and injunction